Apple'' s Tim Cook Deals with Pointed Questions From Judge
Apple Inc.. AAPL -1.48% President Tim Cook dealt with tough questions from the federal judge who will decide whether the iPhone maker operates an improper monopoly, including about the competitiveness of its App Shop payment system.Mr.
Prepare spent about four hours Friday on the witness stand in an Oakland, Calif., court trying to rebut claims by “Fortnite” videogame developer Epic Games Inc. that Apple poorly prohibits contending app shops on the iPhone and forces in-app purchases for digital payments through its own system that takes as much as a 30% cut.
He argued that Apple’s restriction of rival app shops on the iPhone and its persistence on examining all apps offered guarantees the security of users. He likewise pressed back versus Epic legal representatives’ attempts to show the company was motivated by earnings considerations.
As Mr. Cook’s time on the general public witness stand neared an end, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers inserted, keeping in mind that video game developers seemed to be creating an out of proportion amount of money for Apple compared with the technology the iPhone maker was offering in turn.
— type-InsetMediaIllustration post __ inset– inline” >< figure class =" media-object-image enlarge-image renoImageFormat- img-inline article __ inset __ image" itemscope=" itemscope" itemtype =" http://schema.org/ImageObject" >< div data-mobile-ratio= "66.66666666666666% "data-layout-ratio= "66.66666666666666%" data-subtype =" image" class=" image-container responsive-media short article __ inset __ image __ image" >< img srcset=" https://images.wsj.net/im-342165?width=140&size=1.5 140w, https://images.wsj.net/im-342165?width=540&size=1.5 540w, https://images.wsj.net/im-342165?width=620&size=1.5 620w, https://images.wsj.net/im-342165?width=700&size=1.5 700w, https://images.wsj.net/im-342165?width=860&size=1.5 860w, https://images.wsj.net/im-342165?width=1260&size=1.5 1260w" sizes =" (max-width: 140px) 100px,( max-width: 540px) 500px,( max-width: 620px) 580px,( max-width: 700px) 660px,( max-width: 860px )820px, 1260px" src=" https://images.wsj.net/im-342165?width=620&size=1.5" data-enlarge= "https://images.wsj.net/im-342165?width=1260&size=1.5" alt="" title=" Tim Cook in the federal complex in Oakland, Calif., on Friday."/ >< figcaption class=" wsj-article-caption post __ inset __ image __ caption" itemprop= "caption" > Tim Cook in the federal complex in Oakland, Calif., on Friday.< period class= "wsj-article-credit post __ inset __ image __ caption __ credit" itemprop= "creator" > Photo: Noah Berger/Associated Press She stated Apple’s in-app payment system didn’t face competitors and zeroed in on why Apple restricts developers from notifying users in their apps to more affordable alternatives for in-app purchases outside of Apple’s system– a problem that
has actually arisen a number of times throughout the trial. “I understand this idea that in some way Apple brings the client to the gamers, the users, however after that very first time, after that very first interaction … the designers are keeping their clients, Apple is simply benefiting off
that,” she said. Mr. Cook disagreed, arguing that while a lot of the apps in the shop are complimentary to users, their presence helps generate traffic to the store that benefits the video game developers.
“ If we enabled individuals to link out like that we would in essence give up our overall return on “copyright, Mr. Cook said. < div class= "wsj-article-pullquote short article __ inset __ pullquote" readability=" 33" >“‘ We’re not considering the cash at all, we’re considering the user. ‘”– Tim Cook, in court statement Unlike in a jury trial, Judge Gonzalez Rogers will decide the case once it ends Monday. Both sides have actually been closely watching her declarations and concerns throughout the past 3 weeks of the trial to assess how she is leaning; she
had actually previously asked about the concept of permitting developers to inform their users of a more affordable alternative to Apple’s payment system. Long time court observers caution against reading too much into any judge’s statements throughout a case. Judge Gonzalez Rogers’s concerns followed Mr. Cook had attempted to invest much of his time stressing that user security
motivates Apple. “We’re not believing about the cash at all, we’re considering the user,” he said.
Mr. Cook began testifying around 8:15 a.m. regional time by talking about Apple’s commitment to security and personal privacy– a familiar theme for the CEO– and his belief that third-party developers with their own app shops aren’t encouraged to match the level of user defense that Apple provides with its App Shop.
He noted that Apple evaluates about 100,000 apps a week and rejects about 40,000 for different reasons.
< div data-layout=" cover" data-layout-mobile=" "class=" media-object type-InsetRichText wrap scope-web article __ inset short article __ inset-- type-InsetRichText article __ inset-- cover" readability=" 7 ">
SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS Does Apple unjustly limit competitors in the mobile-app marketplace? Why, or why not? Join the discussion listed below.” You can imagine if you turned the evaluation off for how long that it would take the App Store to simply become a hazardous sort of mess, “Mr. Cook stated.” It would be dreadful for the user, but it also would be horrible for the designer since the designer depends on the shop being a safe and relied on place where customers wish to come and feel excellent about negotiating.”
Apple’s case that it isn’t a monopoly has relied on citing Android phones, individual computer systems and videogame consoles as extra methods for Legendary to distribute its “Fortnite” game, and highlighting that other platforms gather a similar commission.
Mr. Cook stated that Apple faced “strong” competition from Alphabet Inc.’s Google, Samsung Electronic Devices Co. and others and stressed how much value his business’s investment in the app economy has actually developed for developers– an assertion fitting claims from Apple’s attorneys that the company’s fees are fair.
” It’s been a financial wonder,” he stated.
” What is the issue with permitting users to have choice– particularly in video gaming material– to find, to having more affordable options?” Judge Gonzalez Rogers asked Mr. Cook.
” I believe they have a choice today,” he reacted. “They have an option between several Android models of a mobile phone or an iPhone, and that iPhone has a certain set of concepts behind it in security, security and personal privacy.”
Mr. Cook’s testimony will be inspected well beyond the courtroom as Apple faces increasing hazards from legislators and regulators around the globe analyzing the power it has over third-party software developers.
Approaching his 10th anniversary as CEO, Mr. Cook is pursuing a method for Apple that involves expanding its digital offerings to balance out any slowdown in iPhone sales.
In total Mr. Cook testified about four hours, consisting of some time behind closed doors. He faced questions from Epic’s attorney of a type that he seldom gets each quarter from Wall Street experts, consisting of about Apple’s elimination of apps for the Chinese federal government and the information of the deal to make Google default online search engine on the iPhone.
During the cross-examination, Epic legal representative Gary Bornstein tried to determine Mr. Cook down on whether business calculates the earnings margin of its App Shop in a quote to highlight that the business is making outsize revenues from developers.